Thomas Lavoie, Sr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of Arizona; Pima County Voters Registrationrecorders' Office; Mike Boyd, Former Recorder; F. Annrodriquez, Pima County Elected Recorder; Delores Johnston,pima County Recorders' Office Employee; L. Bahill;christopher Straub; Coatie Richie; Lt. Bowman; Wesleybrehm; R. Cremeans, Sergeant, Defendants-appellees, 97 F.3d 1459 (9th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Thomas LaVoie, Sr. appeals pro se the district court's dismissals and summary judgments in favor of defendants in LaVoie's action alleging that, by requiring a residential address, Arizona's voting registration is unconstitutional. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo both a dismissal for failure to state a claim, see Stone v. Travelers Corp., 58 F.3d 434, 436-37 (9th Cir. 1995), and summary judgment, see Warren v. City of Carlsbad, 58 F.3d 439, 441 (9th Cir. 1995). After a de novo review, we affirm the district court.
AFFIRMED.1
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
We deny LaVoie's motion to reconsider this court's order denying LaVoie's motion for a settlement conference
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
