Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.raymond E. Ridenour, Appellant, v. Joe Class, Warden, Appellee, 97 F.3d 1457 (8th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 97 F.3d 1457 (8th Cir. 1996) Sept. 12, 1996

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM

Raymond E. Ridenour, a South Dakota prisoner, pleaded guilty to forcibly raping a thirteen-year-old girl. Ridenour was initially sentenced to between seventeen and one-half and twenty years imprisonment, but he successfully sought a writ of habeas corpus in state court based on the sentencing judge's failure to question him concerning the voluntariness of his plea. On remand, Ridenour was resentenced to fifteen years with credit for time served, and the South Dakota Supreme Court affirmed. State v. Ridenour, No. 18655 (unpublished per curiam). Ridenour then filed the instant 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) petition, which the District Court1  denied. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the District Court correctly denied Ridenour's petition. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Ridenour's motion for appointment of new counsel.

 1

The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.