Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.calvin Slade, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Liz Lindsley; Doctor Hammond; Doctor Beacotte; Waynehillard; John Thompson, Warden, Defendants-appellees, 97 F.3d 1449 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 97 F.3d 1449 (4th Cir. 1996) Submitted Sept. 5, 1996. Decided Sept. 17, 1996

Calvin Slade, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988) on his Bivens complaint.*  We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Slade v. Lindsley, No. CA-96-65-1 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 *

See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.