Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.jerry Bradley, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director; Gene M. Johnson, Deputydirector, Defendants--appellees, 95 F.3d 41 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 95 F.3d 41 (4th Cir. 1996) Submitted Aug. 15, 1996. Decided Aug. 21, 1996

Jerry Bradley, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and for a temporary restraining order, preliminary and permanent injunction. Appellant sought to prevent the implementation of a prison regulation governing contraband.

To the extent that Appellant appeals the denial of a temporary restraining order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

To the extent that Appellant appeals the denial of injunctive relief, we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bradley v. Angelone, No. CA-96-134-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 15, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion in this court seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.