Kent W. Porter, Sr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Joan K. Ortiz; Diann A. Smith; Danny K. Marshall,defendants-appellees, 95 F.3d 1158 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 95 F.3d 1158 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. *Decided Aug. 26, 1996

Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Kent W. Porter, Sr., a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in his action alleging that Steilacoom Indian Tribe Chairperson Joan Ortiz, Vice-Chairman Danny Marshall, and Secretary Diann Smith conspired with officials of the Bureau of Indian Affairs to deprive Porter of his First Amendment rights by warning Porter to cease communicating with federal officials and by threatening to alienate him from the tribe if he continued to refer to himself as "Chief."

We are compelled by Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988), to vacate and remand because the district court did not advise Porter, a pro se litigant, of the requirements of the summary judgment rule, Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. See Arreola v. Mangaong, 65 F.3d 801 (9th Cir. 1995).

VACATED and REMANDED.


 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.