United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Earl Hunwardsen, Defendant-appellant, 94 F.3d 653 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 94 F.3d 653 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. *Decided Aug. 16, 1996

Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Earl Hunwardsen appeals his conviction by jury and ten-month sentence imposed for violations of federal tax laws. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hunwardsen's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issue for review. Accordingly, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.