Frederick M. Stoughton, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General; U.S. Postal Serviceagency, Defendants-appellees, 92 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 92 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted July 29, 1996. *Decided Aug. 5, 1996

Before: HUG, Chief Judge; SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Frederick M. Stoughton appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in Stoughton's employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, see Washington v. Garrett, 10 F.3d 1421, 1428 (9th Cir. 1993), and we affirm.

With respect to Stoughton's claims of retaliation and discrimination on the basis of disability, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment on the ground that Stoughton did not file a timely complaint with the district court. See 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b) (2).

Insofar as Stoughton raised defamation claims, we conclude that such claims are not within the Federal Tort Claims Act's waiver of sovereign immunity. See 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h).

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.