Naum Morgovsky, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Cresswell, Cake & Echeguren, a Corporation; Julia Shermanmacdermott, Individually and As an Employee of Cresswell,cake & Echeguren; Trw, a Corporation; Creditors'collection Service of San Francisco, a Corporation Dbapremium Collection Service; Mark Love, Individually and Aspresident of Premium Collection Service, Defendants-appellees, 92 F.3d 1193 (9th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore: HUG, Chief Judge; SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Naum Morgovsky appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his complaint, alleging a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681t ("FCRA"), for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's dismissal of Morgovsky's complaint, Allen v. City of Beverly Hills, 911 F.2d 367, 369 (9th Cir. 1990), and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.