Lin Edward Davis, Plaintiff-appellant, v. C.e. Floyd, Warden; Mike Hall; S. Areborn, Defendants-appellees, 92 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 92 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted July 29, 1996. *Decided Aug. 5, 1996

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Lin Edward Davis appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his action alleging prison officials violated his constitutional rights by subjecting him to prison overcrowding. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's Order filed on December 20, 1995.

AFFIRMED.1 

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

 1

Because of our disposition of this appeal, we do not consider the applicability, if any, of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996), to this appeal

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.