United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David Holmes, Defendant-appellant, 92 F.3d 1186 (6th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- 92 F.3d 1186 (6th Cir. 1996)
Aug. 2, 1996
Before: CONTIE, BOGGS, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
This court, having reviewed defendant's appeal of the district court's denial of defendant's motion for bond pending appeal and the government's brief in opposition, finds that defendant has not established that the appeal raises a substantial question of law or fact. United States v. Bayko, 774 F.2d 516, 522 (1st Cir. 1985).
It is HEREBY ORDERED that the district court's order of April 11, 1996 is AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
