Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.henry W. Martin, Jr., Plaintiff--appellant, v. William K. Suter, Clerk of the Supreme Court of the Unitedstates; Troy D. Cahill, Assistant Clerk of Court; Cynthiarapp, Assistant Clerk of Court; Bert M. Montague, Clerk Ofthe United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit;cheryl M. Williamson, Deputy Clerk, Defendants--appellees, 91 F.3d 131 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-2341-6-OAK)
Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. Suter, No. CA-95-2341-6-OAK (D.S.C. Dec. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
