Gardner Bradley, Plaintiff-appellant, v. T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of Southcarolina, Defendant-appellee, 9 F.3d 1543 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia.
Gardner Bradley, Appellant Pro Se.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's order that dismissed his petition for a writ of mandamus. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bradley v. Medlock, No. CA-93-1007 (D.S.C. June 23, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Since Bradley did not note an appeal from denial of his postjudgment motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) the court's orders denying them are not reviewable in this appeal. See Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 263 n.7 (1978)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
