Robert Wyrick, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ronald Allison, A/k/a Ronald Alessio, A/k/a Dr. Rinaldo;cynthia Allison, Defendants-appellees, 87 F.3d 1326 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 87 F.3d 1326 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted June 11, 1996. *Decided June 14, 1996

Before: CANBY, JOHN T. NOONAN, JR. and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Robert Wyrick, Jr., a former California attorney, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of his diversity action seeking damages against Ronald and Cynthia Allison for breach of an oral agreement regarding attorney's fees. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss.

The district court dismissed Wyrick's action "for the reasons stated in the court's oral analysis in open court" at the hearing on the Allisons' motion to dismiss. Wyrick failed to provide this court with a transcript of the hearing. Without a transcript, we cannot review Wyrick's claims of error. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b) (2); Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169-170 (9th Cir. 1991).

DISMISSED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.