Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.steven E. Hester, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Jack Geise, U.S. Attorney; Bonnie Greenberg, U.s.a.; Lauragwinn, States Attorney; S.p. Stowe, Fbi; Ed Ryan, Fbi;mark Valderez, Fbi; Maurice Hicks, P.g. Police; Detectivebabcock, P.g. Police, Defendants--appellees, 86 F.3d 1150 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 86 F.3d 1150 (4th Cir. 1996) June 3, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95-3552-AMD)


Steven E. Hester, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hester v. Geise, No. CA-95-3552-AMD (D. Md. Dec. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.