James C. Meyers, Plaintiff-appellant, v. U.S. Farm Credit Administration; Billy Ross Brown;department of Agriculture; Bill Clinton; Montanadepartment of Agriculture; Leo Giacometto; Catholic Church& Friends; Wm. H. Keeler, Defendants-appellees, 85 F.3d 637 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case

US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 85 F.3d 637 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted April 30, 1996. *Decided May 6, 1996

Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

James C. Meyers appeals pro se the district court's 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) dismissal of his civil rights action alleging that President Clinton, the Catholic Church and others conspired to deprive him of his property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Meyers's claims are fanciful, delusional, and legally frivolous. Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing his action pursuant to section 1915(d). See Nietzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28 (1989).

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.