Javier Omar Giron-rizo, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent, 85 F.3d 635 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 85 F.3d 635 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted May 9, 1996. Decided May 16, 1996

Before: REINHARDT, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM* 

The petitioner appeals from an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an immigration judge's decision that Giron-Rizo did not qualify for asylum or withholding of deportation. Because the Board conducted a de novo review and did not incorporate the immigration judge's decision, we review the decision of the Board.

Although Giron-Rizo, a citizen and native of Nicaragua, was jailed for three months by the Sandinistas, he acknowledged on his asylum application that he was jailed for deserting the army. It is well established, however, that punishment for desertion does not constitute persecution. Matter of Virgil, Int.Dec. (BIA 1988). Apart from the punishment he received for deserting the army, Giron-Rizo did not present any evidence in his asylum application or hearing to show that he was persecuted in Nicaragua or that he had a well founded fear of persecution. He certainly did not present evidence that "... was such that a reasonable factfinder would have to conclude that the requisite fear existed." INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 812, 815 (1992). Accordingly, we conclude that the BIA's decision that Giron-Rizo was not eligible for asylum was supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. If Giron-Rizo is ineligible for asylum, he is also ineligible for withholding of deportation. INS. v. Cardoza Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421 (1987). Therefore, we affirm the Board's decision.

The Petition is DISMISSED.

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.