United States of America, Appellee, v. Enrique Cruz-ochoa, Appellant, 85 F.3d 325 (8th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 85 F.3d 325 (8th Cir. 1996) Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. Decided May 9, 1996

JUDGMENT

The above-entitled case is set for oral argument as the third case on Tuesday, March 12, 1996. It is hereby ORDERED:

1) The case be stricken from the calendar and dismissed.

2) Our review of the sentencing transcript and record before us leads us to conclude that the district court erred as a matter of law by incorrectly believing that it could not depart downward from the guidelines on the basis of defendant's waiver and consent to administrative deportation upon the filing of a joint motion by the parties for a two-level downward departure at sentencing on defendant's plea of guilty to illegal re-entry.

3) The sentence is vacated and the case remanded for resentencing, so that the district court may consider whether departure is warranted. Whether a downward departure should be granted lies within the sound discretion of the district court. See U.S. v. Whitetail, 956 F.2d 857 (8th Cir. 1992).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.