Ricardo Roybal, Petitioner--appellant, v. Richard Marr, 83 F.3d 433 (10th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 83 F.3d 433 (10th Cir. 1996) April 24, 1996

Before PORFILIO, McKAY and KELLY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

MONROE G. McKAY Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

We affirm for the reasons given in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation as adopted by the district court.

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

 *

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.