Charles Mccarthy, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of Arizona; University Physicians Inc.; Universitymedical Center Corporation; Hugo Villar, Dr.; Richardmandell, Dr.; Arizona Center for Disability Law, Aka Centerfor Law; Charles Carbone; Jack Dillenberg, Aka Jackdillenburg; Arthur Kinneberg, Defendants-appellees, 83 F.3d 427 (9th Cir. 1996)

MEMORANDUM^** 

Charles McCarthy appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of prosecution in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his civil rights were violated by the State of Arizona, its University Medical Center and various other defendants. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The district court's March 13, 1995 order, which dismissed McCarthy's claims against one defendant and granted McCarthy thirty days in which to amend his complaint as to the remaining defendants, was not a "final decision" appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Frank Briscoe Co. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., 776 F.2d 1414, 1416 (9th Cir. 1985); see also Zucker v. Maxicare Health Plans Inc., 14 F.3d 477, 481 (9th Cir. 1994) (" [T]he contingent nature of [the] Judgment means that the district court must still take action; the district court has more to do than simply execute the Judgment."). Thus, this court has no jurisdiction to hear McCarthy's appeal from this order. See Frank Briscoe Co., 776 F.2d at 1416.¹ 

DISMISSED.