United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Rudolph Owen Cheatham, Defendant-appellant, 8 F.3d 821 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Rudolph Owen Cheatham, Appellant Pro Se.
Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Rudolph Owen Cheatham appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cheatham, Nos. CR-91-12-5; CA-93-202-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
