David Felton, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of North Carolina; James P. Bailey, United Statesmagistrate Judge; Jerry Clayton; H. M. Michaux;durham County; Durham City, Defendants-appellees, 8 F.3d 817 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-153-F)
David Felton, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
David Felton appeals from the district court's orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint, and denying his subsequently-filed motion to amend his complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Felton v. State of North Carolina, No. CA-93-153-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 1993 and May 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
