Khalil Adil M. Al-furqan, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of California, Defendant-appellee, 78 F.3d 591 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 78 F.3d 591 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. *Decided March 4, 1996

Before: PREGERSON, CANBY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Khalil Adil M. Al-Furqan appeals the district court's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (6) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when the California Department of Motor Vehicles refused to renew his driver's license after the Alameda County Municipal Court unconstitutionally upheld the traffic citations issued by an Oakland police officer.

We affirm the district court's conclusions that Al-Furqan's claims against the police officer were barred under California's one year statute of limitations and his remaining claims, which Al-Furqan failed to amend, do not allege with at least some degree of particularity any overt acts by a person subject to suit under section 1983. See Taylor v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 993 F.2d 710, 711 (9th Cir. 1993) (per curiam), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 890 (1994); Jones v. Community Redev. Agency, 733 F.2d 646, 649 (9th Cir. 1984).

We reject Al-Furqan's allegations of judicial bias. See United States v. Chischilly, 30 F.3d 1144, 1149 (9th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.