United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Stanley E. Amos, Defendant-appellant, 77 F.3d 490 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 77 F.3d 490 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. *Decided Feb. 12, 1996

Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Stanley E. Amos appeals from the district court's order affirming his conviction, following a bench trial before a magistrate judge, for assault on a law enforcement officer on a military reservation in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(e). Amos contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction and that the district court erred by permitting a lay witness to testify regarding whether the assault took place within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's June 14, 1995 order.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.