Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides That Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except when Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel, 77 F.3d 489 (9th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseNo. 94-36082.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.* Decided Feb. 12, 1996.
Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Thomas A. Lakosh appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action alleging violations of 29 U.S.C. §§ 158 and 411. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, Lakosh's request for oral argument is denied. We also deny Loakosh's motion for sanctions on appeal
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
