Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.henry T. Sanders, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of Maryland; Court of Appeals of Maryland,defendants-appellees, 77 F.3d 470 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 77 F.3d 470 (4th Cir. 1996) Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. Decided Feb. 21, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-95-2216-DKC)

Henry T. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sanders v. Maryland, No. CA-95-2216-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 11, 1995; Sept. 13, 1995; Oct. 11, 1995). We deny Appellant's motions for sanctions and judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.