United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Perry Hyde, Defendant-appellant, 76 F.3d 389 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 76 F.3d 389 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Jan. 23, 1996. *Decided Jan. 26, 1996

Before: ALARCON, HALL and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Perry Hyde appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, for five drug related charges in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (1) (D) & (a) (1), 844(a), and 853. Hyde's contention that his prosecution was barred by double jeopardy arising from a prior uncontested administrative forfeiture of his property is foreclosed by this court's decision in United States v. Cretacci, 62 F.3d 307 (9th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, his conviction and sentence is

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.