United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Binh Si Banh, Defendant-appellant, 76 F.3d 389 (9th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore: BRUNETTI and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and HAGEN** , District Judge.
MEMORANDUM***
Appellant Binh Si Banh appeals the district court's denial of his motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In his opening brief, Banh requests appointment of appellate counsel.
A de novo review of Banh's § 2255 motion reveals that it has no merit. Banh's request for counsel is therefore denied. The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district judge's order entered December 16, 1994.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4
Hon. David Warner Hagen, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
