Leda O'brien, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States Department of Justice; Janet Reno, Attorneygeneral; Ted Kennedy; Nancy Reagan; Barbara Bush, Firstlady; Bruce Babbitt; Weldon Kennedy, Fbi Agent; Farmersinsurance Company; Truck Insurance Exchange; State Ofarizona; Fife Symington, Governor; Grant Woods, Attorneygeneral; Church of Latter Day Saints; City of Phoenix;frank Fairbanks, City Manager, Agent of the City of Phoenix;dennis Garrett, Chief of Police, Agent of the City Ofphoenix; Rick Romley, County Attorney, Agent of the Countyof Maricopa; Joe Arpaio, County Sheriff; Andy Williams;johnny Mathis; Neil Diamond; Eddie Basha, Defendants-appellees, 76 F.3d 387 (9th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore: ALARCON, HALL and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
We affirm the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of Leda O'Brien's action for the reasons set forth in the district court's order filed July 13, 1995.1
We deny appellees' request for attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. See Branson v. Nott, 62 F.3d 287, 293 (9th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, O'Brien's motion for oral argument is denied
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
We decline to consider O'Brien's argument, raised for the first time in her reply brief, that the district court improperly imposed Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 sanctions
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
