Wayne T. Palmer, Petitioner, v. Department of the Interior, Respondent, 74 F.3d 1259 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 74 F.3d 1259 (Fed. Cir. 1996) Jan. 3, 1996

Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAYER, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

ARCHER, Chief Judge.


The court considers whether Wayne T. Palmer's petition for review should be dismissed because he seeks review of the Merit Systems Protection Board's decision before both the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and this court.

In his Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning discrimination, Palmer selected statement 3, indicating that he sought review only of the Board's dismissal of his case for lack of jurisdiction or for untimeliness. However, the Board did not dismiss his case for lack of jurisdiction for for untimeliness. He also indicated that he had requested the EEOC to review the Board's final decision on his discrimination claims. A petitioner may not seek review of the Board's decision before both the EEOC and this court. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b) (1).

On November 17, 1995, we directed Palmer to inform the court whether he would pursue his case before the EEOC or this court. We informed Palmer that if he intended to proceed before the EEOC, this court would dismiss his case. Conversely, if Palmer intended to proceed before this court, we directed him to dismiss his case before the EEOC and submit an amended R. 15(c) statement within 21 days indicating that he had abandoned any claims of discrimination.

Palmer responds that he does not want this court to dismiss his case. However, he states that he will not abandon his claims of discrimination and that he intends to proceed before the EEOC. Thus, this court must dismiss his petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Palmer's petition for review is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.