Eric Smith, Petitioner--appellant, v. Eugene Nuth, Warden; Attorney General of the State Ofmaryland, Respondents--appellees, 74 F.3d 1233 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseEric Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Nuth, No. CA-95-1885-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 3, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
