Marcus A. Joseph, Plaintiff--appellant, v. R.c. Peterson; Nancy Bloom; Bill Austin, Individually Andin Their Official and Professional Capacities,defendants--appellees, 74 F.3d 1232 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 74 F.3d 1232 (4th Cir. 1996) Submitted Jan. 11, 1996. Decided Jan. 24, 1996

Marcus A. Joseph, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Joseph v. Peterson, No. CA-95-2457-2-17AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED