Herman E. Harston, Plaintiff-appellant, v. P.l. Huffman; Jimmy L. Hylton, Defendants-appellees.herman E. Harston, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Chris Peterson; Principal Umberger; Mr. St. John,defendants-appellees, 74 F.3d 1231 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 74 F.3d 1231 (4th Cir. 1996)

Submitted: January 11, 1996. Decided: January 23, 1996


Herman E. Harston, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA; Peter Duane Vieth, Wooten & Hart, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


In these consolidated appeals Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harston v. Huffman, No. CA-94-788-R; Harston v. Peterson, No. CA-94-175 (W.D. Va. July 11, 1995; June 15, 1995, and Oct. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED