Robert Chambers, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Kenneth Sutton, Defendant-appellee, 74 F.3d 1231 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 74 F.3d 1231 (4th Cir. 1996)

Submitted: Jan. 11, 1996. Decided: Jan. 24, 1996


Robert Chambers, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.*  We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Chambers v. Sutton, No. CA-95-486-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)