Robert Chambers, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Kenneth Sutton, Defendant-appellee, 74 F.3d 1231 (4th Cir. 1996)Annotate this Case
Submitted: Jan. 11, 1996. Decided: Jan. 24, 1996
Robert Chambers, Appellant Pro Se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Chambers v. Sutton, No. CA-95-486-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)