William Thomas Ealey, Jr., Plaintiff--appellant, v. Charles Hawley; Thomas Breedlove; Jane Doe; John Keku,doctor; Doctor Lites; Doctor Baloch; Doctor Smith;doctor Daniels; John Doe; Doctor Davenport; Ms. Kelly;doctor Shah; V.l. Evans; Percy Davis; Mr. Batten; Lynnphillips, Defendants--appellees, 74 F.3d 1231 (4th Cir. 1996)Annotate this Case
Submitted Dec. 14, 1995. Decided Jan. 17, 1996
William Thomas Ealey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ealey v. Hawley, No. CA-95-490-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.