Jenis Walter Branch, Petitioner-appellant, v. Edward Murray, Respondent-appellee, 74 F.3d 1230 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseJenis Walter Branch, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) habeas petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Branch v. Murray, No. CA-94-77-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
