David Maurice Beatty, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James Phillip Griffin, Defendant-appellee, 74 F.3d 1230 (4th Cir. 1996)Annotate this Case
Submitted: December 14, 1995. Decided: January 17, 1996
David Maurice Beatty, Appellant Pro Se.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Beatty v. Griffin, No. CA-95-234-CT-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The district court's typographical error that Plaintiff, rather than Defendant, was employed by the North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services is of no moment