United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David Earl Craft, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Harold Speer, Defendant-appellant, 73 F.3d 371 (9th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- 73 F.3d 371 (9th Cir. 1995)
Submitted Dec. 19, 1995. *Decided Dec. 27, 1995
Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
We affirm the district court's order denying appellants' motions to dismiss their indictments based on double jeopardy. See United States v. Cretacci, 62 F.3d 307 (9th Cir. 1995) (administrative forfeiture of unclaimed property does not constitute punishment); United States v. Washington, 69 F.3d 401, 404 (9th Cir. 1995) (Cretacci applies retroactively to direct criminal appeals).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.