Seleen v. County of Spokane, 73 F.3d 370 (9th Cir. 1995)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 73 F.3d 370 (9th Cir. 1995) Argued and Submitted Oct. 18, 1995. Decided Dec. 29, 1995

Before: REINHARDT and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER,*  District Judge,

ORDER** 

We agree with the district court that the prisoner-appellants are not employees for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. See Hale v. State of Ariz., 993 F.2d 1387 (9th Cir. 1993) (en banc).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for an extension of time in which to file (possible) amendments to the already once-amended complaint. Accordingly, the orders and judgment of the district court are

AFFIRMED.

 *

The Honorable William W. Schwarzer, Senior District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.