Seleen v. County of Spokane, 73 F.3d 370 (9th Cir. 1995)Annotate this Case
Argued and Submitted Oct. 18, 1995. Decided Dec. 29, 1995
Before: REINHARDT and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER,* District Judge,
We agree with the district court that the prisoner-appellants are not employees for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. See Hale v. State of Ariz., 993 F.2d 1387 (9th Cir. 1993) (en banc).
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for an extension of time in which to file (possible) amendments to the already once-amended complaint. Accordingly, the orders and judgment of the district court are