Kennedy Williams, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Charlie J. Cepak, Warden; Pris Mack, Associate Warden,individually, and in Their Official Capacities,defendants-appellees, 73 F.3d 359 (4th Cir. 1995)Annotate this Case
Submitted: December 12, 1995. Decided: December 21, 1995
Kennedy Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Holly Saleeby Atkins, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Cepak, No. CA-94-3007-6-2AK (D.S.C. July 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.