Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Plaintiff--appellant, v. Sergeant Cannon; Assistant Warden Lee; Gary Dixon;correctional Officer Williamson; Lieutenantmoody, Defendants-appellees, 73 F.3d 358 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 73 F.3d 358 (4th Cir. 1995)

Dec. 22, 1995


Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint for failure to comply with an order directing Appellant to particularize his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Cannon, No. CA-95-95-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.