Dee Deidre Farmer; William Cherry, Plaintiffs--appellants, v. Terry Pennington, Lieutenant; Robert Fox, Unit Manager; J.robinson, Correctional Counselor; Jerry Gaughan,disciplinary Hearing Officer,defendants--appellees, 73 F.3d 357 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseDee Deidre Farmer, William Cherry, Appellants Pro Se.
Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farmer v. Pennington, No. CA-95-440-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
