Charles M. Byers, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Michael H. Doherty; Thomas W. Barham; Charles Mcdonnell;kermit A. Rosenberg; Robert P. Holmes; Radigan,rosenberg & Holmes, P.c.; Barham &radigan, P.c., Defendants-appellees, 73 F.3d 356 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseCharles M. Byers, Appellant Pro Se. Antonia Beatrice Ianniello, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration and rehearing, and denying his motion for recusal. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Byers v. Doherty, No. CA-93-295-A (E.D. Va. June 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
