Terry Ulrich, Plaintiff-appellant, v. K-mart Corporation, Defendant-appellee, 70 F.3d 1282 (10th Cir. 1995)

Plaintiff Terry Ulrich appeals the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendant K-Mart Corporation on Plaintiff's claims for sexual harassment, retaliation, and constructive discharge under Title VII, 42 U.S.C.2000e to 2000e-17, and the Kansas Act Against Discrimination, Kan. Stat. Ann. 44-1001 to 44-1044. See Ulrich v. K-Mart Corp., 858 F. Supp. 1087 (D. Kan. 1994). Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no genuinely disputed material issues of fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). We review a summary judgment de novo, viewing the record in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Ball v. Renner, 54 F.3d 664, 665 (10th Cir. 1995). Upon careful consideration of the record, the briefs of the parties, the district court's order, and the applicable law, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the district court's order.

AFFIRMED.