Amezell Lilly, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Kelly Springfield Tire Company, Defendant-appellee, 7 F.3d 224 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 7 F.3d 224 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: May 26, 1993. Decided: September 17, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville.

Amezell Lilly, Appellant Pro Se.

Kimberly Jo Korando, Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED

Before WILKINSON, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Amezell Lilly appeals from the district court's order that granted summary judgment to the Defendants in her action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lilly v. Kelly Springfield, No. CA-91-47-CIV-3-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.