Nathaniel Brown, Individually and As Father of Nannetteannita Brown, an Infant; Nannette Annita Brown,an Infant, Through Her Father and Nextfriend, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. the Du Pont Merck Pharmaceutical Company, Defendant-appellee, 7 F.3d 222 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 7 F.3d 222 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: July 6, 1993. Decided: September 24, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-92-1608-A)

Nathaniel Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Fred Calvin Alexander, Jr., McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Nathaniel Brown appeals from the district court's order that dismissed his civil action without prejudice because he did not comply with court orders concerning discovery. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Du Pont Merck Pharmaceutical Co., No. CA-92-1608-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1993).*  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

We deny Du Pont Merck's motion to dismiss the appeal

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.