United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Raul Valenzuela-cervantes, Defendant-appellant, 67 F.3d 310 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 67 F.3d 310 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. *Decided Sept. 29, 1995

Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Raul Valenzuela-Cervantes appeals his conviction pursuant to his conditional guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation and conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a), (b) (1), and (b) (2). Valenzuela-Cervantes contends that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for further discovery to support his claim of selective prosecution of Latinos.

Since the district court's decision in this case, we decided United States v. Armstrong, 48 F.3d 1508 (9th Cir. 1995) (en banc). For the reasons set forth in United States v. Rendon-Abundez, 59 F.3d 1001, 1002 (9th Cir. 1995), we remand to the district court for reconsideration of the motion in light of our opinions in Armstrong and United States v. Gomez-Lopez, 62 F.3d 304 (9th Cir. 1995), and in accord with the instructions in Rendon-Abundez.

REMANDED.


 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.