Albert Bender, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Attorney General for the State of Arizona, Civil Rightsdivision; Richard Martinez, Individually and Inhis Capacity As an Attorney with Officeof the Attorney General,defendants-appellees, 67 F.3d 305 (9th Cir. 1995)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 67 F.3d 305 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. *Decided Sept. 27, 1995

Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

We affirm the district court's sua sponte dismissal of attorney Albert Bender's Title VII action in light of his repeated failure to comply with the court's deadlines for filing a joint report of counsel. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 321 (1992).1 

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

 1

Bender timely filed a notice of appeal within thirty days of the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (4)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.