Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.silas Trowell, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sheriff Drew; Sheriff Overman; Maintenance Department;deputy Allen; Lieutenant Young; Deputy Oats; Captaino'brien; Medical Department; Deputy Danner; Captainsmith; Major Mann; Deputy Howell, Sr.; Virginiacorrectional Center for Women; City of Virginia Beach;virginia Beach Sheriff's Department; Virginia Beach Firedepartment, Defendants-appellees, 64 F.3d 659 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 64 F.3d 659 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: July 27, 1995. Decided: Aug. 17, 1995

Silas Trowell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court dismissed three of Appellant's claims with prejudice, and the remaining claims were dismissed without prejudice for failure to particularize the complaint and identify specific defendants. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the dismissals with prejudice on the reasoning of the district court. Trowell v. Drew, No. CA-94-1134-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 1995). However, because the dismissals without prejudice are not appealable, we dismiss the appeal with regard to those claims. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.