Allen M. Nelson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 62 F.3d 1425 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 62 F.3d 1425 (9th Cir. 1995)

Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. *Decided Aug. 8, 1995

Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.


Taxpayer Allen M. Nelson appeals pro se the district court's order enforcing an Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") summons issued to a third-party recordkeeper for the purpose of determining Nelson's income tax liability for tax years 1990 and 1991. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for clear error, United States v. Derr, 969 F.2d 943, 945 (9th Cir. 1992), and affirm.

Nelson essentially contends that the IRS lacked authority to issue the summons because Congress has never enacted the relevant portions of Title 26 of the United States Code into positive law. This contention is frivolous.

The payment of income taxes is not voluntary. Wilcox v. Commissioner, 848 F.2d 1007, 1008 (9th Cir. 1988). The fact that relevant portions of Title 26 of the United States Code have not been enacted into "positive law" does not render the Code unenforceable. Ryan v. Bilby, 764 F.2d 1325, 1328 (9th Cir. 1985). Thus, the IRS had authority to issue and serve the summonses. See id.



The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4


This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3