United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Salvador Martinez-sanchez, Defendant - Appellant, 61 F.3d 913 (9th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. No. CR-94-00184-ER; Edward Rafeedie, District Judge, Presiding.
C.D. Cal.
REMANDED.
Before: LAY** , BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges
ORDER
Salvador Martinez-Sanchez appeals his conviction and sentence for violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) (1). He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion for additional discovery to support his claim of selective prosecution. For the reasons set forth in United States v. Rendon-Abundez, F.3d, No. 94-50352 (9th Cir. July 13, 1995), we remand to the district court for reconsideration of the motion in light of our opinion in United States v. Armstrong, 48 F.3d 1508 (9th Cir. 1995) (en banc), and in accord with the instructions in Rendon-Abundez.
REMANDED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.